Charter schools may be possible cure for education
College is full of uncertainty. But probably the most reliable thing during anyone’s time here is that if you make it to your senior year, you will be recruited by Teach For America (TFA).
The same recruiter has come to three of my classes now. A friend is being personally recruited, which has included a dinner at Flat Top, and a trip to Chicago to observe a current TFA volunteer in action in one of the schools.
Without a doubt, TFA is a noble pursuit, and an organization which has undoubtedly helped thousands of disadvantaged students. And it is a very competitive organization to join as well. Last year the organization rejected over 80 percent of its applicants.
But in the end TFA is like Tylenol to a cancer patient. It might mask the pain, but doesn’t do much to cure the disease. And even then, it’s only Tylenol, so it doesn’t even help the pain that much.
The recruiter ended with the same point both times, which is the crux of the problem. In America today the quality of education that someone receives depends on five numbers, their zip code.
A child is obligated to go to the public school in his or her district, even if it is a failing school. Inevitably, those failing schools are mostly in poor, urban districts, the very type that TFA is trying to help. There is no way for these kids to escape these schools either, as private schools are unaffordable and unreachable.
But the answer we hear repeatedly to help those schools is to spend more money: for the schools and teachers, for better teacher education programs, and for recruiting more teachers.
But that is just more Tylenol to a systemic problem. More money doesn’t necessarily lead to a better education. Chicago, contrary to what many might say, spends more per pupil than the national average, yet graduates under fifty percent of its students, far beneath the national average.
The problem isn’t with how much money is spent, but rather how it is spent, and how the school is run. That seems logical, but today most public schools are choked with bureaucracy and run by teachers’ unions who stifle innovation and reform.
For example, one of the reasons why TFA is so selective is because unions put limits on the percent of new hires that are TFA volunteers. The excuse given is that it protects educational quality, but an Urban Institute study released last year found that TFA corps members significantly outperformed teachers with three or more years of experience.
The problem is that the public education system today faces no competition, so it has no incentive to improve.
Enter charter schools. Charter schools, which are publicly funded, nonselective and privately run schools, are open to anyone, regardless of where they live. And the data is almost universally positive.
A RAND corporation study on charter schools in Chicago found that for charter eighth graders who went on to attend a charter high school, ACT scores increased, the probability of graduating went up by seven percent, and probability of enrolling in college by eleven percent.
Another study by a Stanford economist found that poor urban kids who attend a charter school starting in kindergarten and continuing through eighth grade close the learning gap in math and reading by 66 percent and 88 percent, respectively, with their more affluent white counterparts. And yet another study by the Manhattan Institute found that charter schools even help traditional public schools since they must respond to charter competition.
The benefits are enormous and conclusive, but unfortunately there is a cap on the amount of charter schools that can be built in Illinois, and in most other states, mostly due to teacher union influence. Perhaps the better way then to help the kids that TFA volunteers teach would be to start an organization called Charters for America, in which members would lobby their state congressman or senator for more charter schools.
However it’s done, it’s time for surgery on the public education system, not more painkillers.
Jordan is a senior in MCB.
Reader's Comments
About Different Perspectives
On a college campus of 40,000 unique individuals, opinions differ on every subject. The Daily Illini strives to encourage a wide-range of thoughts and ideas that harnesses the diversity of the University. Enter Different Perspective, a blog that captures the differing thoughts on campus through a hand-selected group of talented writers with strong opinions from all sides of the spectrum. On it you’ll find both lengthy, thoughtful pieces and random musings, as well as other topics that spark debate. And if you don’t agree, just comment back. Speak up UI. We know we will.
Most Popular
- College GameDay crew's thoughts on visit to Champaign
- Is it really just another Krush?
- Authorities address student concerns in public safety forum
- McCamey, Illini ready for ‘challenges' against No. 11 Wisconsin
- Scott Lee Cohen nomination proves Illinois is going down the drain
- Meet this year's Student Trustee candidates
- DARS error puts pressure on students
- Housing Guide 2010
- Students continue to help Haiti
- Signature victory justifies students' storming of court
Apartment Search
908 West Stoughton, UrbanaWalk to Campus! This building is only 2 ½ blocks from the U of I campus. Advantage Properties is a...
503 East Clark Street, ChampaignAvailable August 2010. Offers furnished efficiency apartments. Units include a large living/bedroom...
The apartment is 8 blocks from the Quad and available 1/1/2010. Renters have access to a washer and...
1205 E. Florida, UrbanaCrestview Commons is a convenient, affordable solution for those who don't want to pay high campus...
Convenient location. Near Engineering Quad and County Market. Central Heating and Air Conditioning....
Classifieds
- 209/211 E. Clark, C. Apartments (Furnished)
- 508, 510, & 512 E. STOUGHTON, C. Apartments (Furnished)
- 706 S. WALNUT, U. Apartments (Furnished)
- 111 E. Chalmers, C. Apartments (Furnished)
- 4 BR House @ 107 S. Birch Houses for Rent
- One Day Sale Apartments (Furnished)
- Available Now 4 Br Houses for Rent
- Available Now 4 BR Houses for Rent
- Vintage 1 BR Apartments (Unfurnished)
- Now Leasing Apartments (Furnished)
Restaurants & Bars
Are you hungry, but need to stick to your diet? These places have tasty salads.
Calendar
- Explore Mammals of Illinois
Rantoul Public Library - Feb 09, 2010 7:00 pm
- Feb 09, 2010 9:00 pm- William M. Staerkel Planetarium
William M. Staerkel Planetarium - Feb 10, 2010 1:00 am - This Iz US Tuesday
Highdive - Feb 09, 2010 9:00 pm - Build Your Own Basket
Savoy Recreational Center - Feb 10, 2010 12:00 am




Have you ever worked in a public school?
I am not sure if you have any experience in public school teaching, but I wouldn't be so quick to blame unions. I have several good friends who are teachers, in both regular ed and special ed (not in IL). One is at a charter school. He gets paid less, works more hours, and is at the mercy of the "board" which is a group of parents who, no offense, are not education professionals. Furthermore, I challenge you to take a look at the alums of TFA: how many are still teaching K-12? Many simply use the program to get into law or business school because it "looks good" on their applications. Also, I encourage you to speak with professional teachers who have worked with TFA recruits and ask them what they think. It's pretty interesting. I just don't see how TFA really makes that much of an impact.
From Reality to Theory
The opposition to charter schools makes no sense. The 'old' model clearly isn't working - we don't graduate enough students, and the ones who do graduate high school have eighth-grade skill levels.
Dissolving existing school districts in favor of 'open enrollment' is also a bad idea. Instead of elevating all of education, I fear that arrangement would only drag down the high-achieving schools.
Charter school opponents seem to be arguing that what works in practice doesn't work in theory.
I wouldn't lay all the blame on unions, however. They don't control school districts. Their influence is enormous, but the education stranglehold is shared between the unions and the district administration. They've partnered to get us into this mess, so it's understandable they would resist any changes.
Also, I'm curious as to why
Also, I'm curious as to why the DI's comment sections are labelled "Reader's Comments". Only one reader's comments are shown? That doesn't make for very good discussion.
People running a website for a 'newspaper' (for lack of a better term) of all people should know how to properly use apostrophes. I spent 45 minutes yesterday learning the Cyrillic alphabet, just for the hell of it. If I can do that, surely you can learn apostrophe+s for singular and s+apostrophe for plural.
For all the recruiting Teach
For all the recruiting Teach for America does, and as desperate as they claim to need math and science teachers, the need can't be that great, because they wouldn't even give me a spot in their first round of admissions, and I am qualified to teach math and physics. Go figure.
You have it all wrong
Realistically, Charter schools privatize education making it a commodity rather than a public good. The problem with Charter schools is that they siphon money away from public schools. These same Charter schools make their own rules and some don't require a teacher's certificate. Why should anyone make education a competition? It is ludicrous to suggest that making a education a neo-liberal concept (a market). Treating education as a business is absolutely wrong. You treat it as a business, expect it to fail. Sadly, this is the model that Arne Duncan wants to implement...and he has no education experience whatsoever. He didn't do much in Chicago but to make Ren 10, a disaster in the making. Btw, Ren 10 was the idea of the Commercial Club, a group of business people in Chicago, not educators. I highly suggest you look into the affects of what Charter schools do. I also suggest you look into some of the work done by Pauline Lipman from UIC to further understand what this concept of neo-liberalism does to education.
Post new comment:
All comments are published at the discretion of The Daily Illini. Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them and do not reflect the views of The Daily Illini, Illini Media or its affiliated and related entities, or its partners, sponsors, advertisers or content providers. Comments are intended to be a means of reaction to a specific article, podcast, or gallery and will be moderated for obscenity and hateful language. Do not submit commercial, off-topic or other copyrighted material.