U-C Senate represents best of UI community

Post a comment
Posted: August 30, 2009 - 10:42 PM
Updated: August 30, 2009 - 10:49 PM
Tagged with: admissions, Campus, Chancellor, Community, Editorials, faculty, instructors, members, President, Senate, students, teachers, UC Senate, University
Printer Friendly

Possibly Related


Students have a voice. But sometimes, their voice must come through others.

Today, the Urbana-Champaign Faculty Senate is meeting to discuss “admissions-related policy” at Illinois, and they will vote on proposals about the future well-being of our campus.

Besides students, the faculty is what makes our University a great institution. These individuals are irreplaceable.

The senate may vote to remove President White and Chancellor Herman from their posts as leaders of the University. Then again, they may not. However, whatever their decisions, the Board of Trustees must heed their vote. Though the board makes the final decision, the voice of the faculty should inform, if not determine, that decision.

Which is easier to replace: around 3,000 displeased faculty members or one University president? Three thousand faculty members or one chancellor?

The faculty’s opinion on the admissions controversy is extremely important. That cannot be stressed enough.

There are teachers at the University that we, as students, will remember for the rest of our lives. There are instructors that will help us become what we once only dreamed of being. It might be hard to find someone on this campus who could say President White or Chancellor Herman had a lasting, personal effect on their educational decisions. Except, perhaps, those they helped wrongly admit.

Instead, it is our teachers who we are most in touch with, and whose thoughts on this situation really matter to us. They are the closest to us, and they are the University’s backbone.

Every year, there is a huge turnover within the student population. Thousands come in as freshmen; thousands leave as graduated seniors. Our University faculty members are the closest thing to a constant that this University has. They have worked under multiple presidents and multiple chancellors. We would like to thank them for representing us, the students, in a place and on an issue that we officially cannot weigh in.

The Board of Trustees should realize how smoothly an institution can run when the administration and faculty are on the same page, when leaders are respected and when educators are in a position of power. The board should also note how poorly a University can operate when two of the leading officials are not respected by those they lead. We can only hope the faculty are truthful during these meetings and make decisions that are in the best interest of students and the University they have chosen.

Post a comment

Reader Comments

skiparoo

Flag this comment

well done. it will take more than hope to extract the guilty.

Fellow Student

Flag this comment

"Students have a voice. But sometimes, their voice must come through others."

Others? Does this mean other students??

The students are actually involved in this process. The student senators, ISS, that are elected each year comprise roughly 20% of the U-C Senate. This means that the student elections held in spring, which many people ignored, are actually important. The student senators work on the U-C Senate and their committees which shape University policies and provide direction for the University. And they will take part in this afternoon's meeting.

wait a minute

Flag this comment

Not all faculty are unified in throwing out campus leadership over this admissions scandal. Remember the July letter supporting the chancellor signed by 48 faculty, including some of the biggest names on campus: May Berenbaum, Robert McChesney, Leon Dash, Gene Robinson, Carl Woese, Charles Slichter, Richard Powers, Karl Hess, Anthony Leggett, and many other very distinguished scholars.

Look it up: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/letters/chi-090706illinois2_briefs,0,6054967.story?page=1

It isn't exactly 3,000 vs. 2 here.

The Hounds of TASSersville

Flag this comment

How about the DI admit that one of the reasons we have such corrupt leadership was the involvement of the U-C Senate and Faculty in the search comittees for them?

Who gave us Cantor?

Who gave us White?

Who got a cushy faculty job in the College of Business by White?

Surely the the boot-licking support for Herman from the College of Clout (that is, Law) is not simply good feeling.

If the U-C Senate represented the best of the UI community, it is likely that the scandal would not have been as bad as it has demonstrated (if it would have existed at all).

Posted by Hound No. 9

Post new comment

You Should Know: The Daily Illini reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.

Comments will not appear until approved by a site moderator.

Formatting Options:
  • Links: "my link":http://my.url.com
  • Bold: *something!*
  • Italic: _OMG!_