The Daily Illini
URL: http://www.dailyillini.com/index.php/blog/different_perspectives/2009/10/moore_proves_libertarians_right
Current Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:24:14 -0600
Moore proves Libertarians right
The latest from Michael Moore, Capitalism: A Love Story, was widely released this past weekend. I have not yet gotten around to seeing the film, partly because it doesn't appear as if any local theaters are carrying it, and also because masochism really isn't my thing.
But one doesn't really need to see the movie to guess the ending.
As Moore evidently concludes at the end of his movie, "Capitalism is evil, and you cannot regulate evil. You have to eliminate it and replace it with something that is good for all people and that something is democracy."
What exactly constitutes this democracy one can make an educated guess. Moore recently appeared in an online interview with Bernie Sanders, a Vermont senator and self-proclaimed socialist, to ask what the problem was with American capitalism.
Moore is a bit late in attacking capitalism. French President Nicolas Sarkozy proclaimed last year that laissez-faire is finished.
Nancy Pelosi, in the debate before the vote on the bank bailout, stated that "Democrats believe in the free market ... but in this unbridled form ... it has created chaos."
This tells the truly sad story of our day, that of libertarians, or dedicated limited government advocates. John Hasnas, a professor of business at Georgetown, explained quite accurately what it feels like to be a libertarian, in an essay by that very name.
"It feels bad. Being a libertarian means living with an almost unendurable level of frustration. It means being subject to unending scorn and derision despite being inevitably proven correct by events...
Imagine spending two decades warning that government policy is leading to a major economic collapse, and then, when the collapse comes, watching the world conclude that markets do not work."
He explains:
"Imagine spending years decrying federal intervention in the home mortgage market; pointing out the dangers associated with legislation such as the Community Reinvestment Act that forces lenders to make more risky loans than they otherwise would; testifying before Congress on the lack of oversight and inevitable insolvency of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to legislators... and then, when the housing market implodes under the weight of bad loans, watching the collapse get blamed on the greed and rapaciousness of "Wall Street.""
Moore and the left attribute the meltdown to Wall Street greed. To really get this point, you can play the money to burn game on the movie's website, where you go to jail if you win. But as Thomas Sowell put it, saying the financial meltdown was caused by greed is like saying that plane crashes are caused by gravity.
It goes beyond the financial system.
People attribute the runaway costs in health care insurance to a failure of the free market, yet conveniently overlook the fact that fifty percent of medical expenditures are paid for by the government in systems that create perverse incentives for runaway costs.
What the government doesn't directly pay for is controlled through mandates and tax exclusions that prevent the market from functioning.
But instead of getting the government out of the health care industry, Obama wants to expand its role in it. But instead of getting the government out of the housing industry and taking away the incentive from mortgage companies to lend to people who can't afford homes, Obama calls for more regulation and then gets the government involved in a few more industries. Instead of reducing people's tax burden, allowing them to keep more of their money, and increasing their incentive to work, Obama increases unemployment and Medicaid benefits, which does just the opposite and actually creates a greater dependency on the government.
There seem to be green shoots of a libertarian awakening taking place over the past several months with the tea parties, but most of those people will probably go away when Republicans take control again and conveniently ignore the inevitable continued expansion of government, just as most of them did under the debacle that was Bush.
I'd imagine it's like being a Cubs fan, except there usually isn't much hope for next year.
Jordan is a senior in LAS.
About Different Perspectives
On a college campus of 40,000 unique individuals, opinions differ on every subject. The Daily Illini strives to encourage a wide-range of thoughts and ideas that harnesses the diversity of the University. Enter Different Perspective, a blog that captures the differing thoughts on campus through a hand-selected group of talented writers with strong opinions from all sides of the spectrum. On it you’ll find both lengthy, thoughtful pieces and random musings, as well as other topics that spark debate. And if you don’t agree, just comment back. Speak up UI. We know we will.
Subscribe with RSSRecent Posts
Most Popular
- Memes, Y U so addicting?! |
1 hour ago
Posted in: Different Perspectives - Despite another ring, Eli is still not as good as Peyton |
7 hours ago
Posted in: DI Sports Wrap-Up - For better or for worse |
2/2/2012 - 6:43 PM
Posted in: Different Perspectives - Don’t sleep on the Big 12 |
2/1/2012 - 12:23 AM
Posted in: DI Sports Wrap-Up - Eli Manning and Tom Brady represent the unstoppable passage of time |
1/30/2012 - 7:23 PM
Posted in: Different Perspectives
- Letter to the editor: Which side are you on, DI? | 3 comments
- Note to Occupy participants: Peace is stronger | 6 comments
- Email scandal occupies center stage | 5 comments
- Obama should take his cues from Brazilian president Rousseff | 15 comments
- Romney's unfair share points to deeper issues | 3 comments
- Caitlin on ‘Finger-wagging’ by UN fails to show authority
- Leo M. Schwaiger on Filmmaker starts week as Allen’s Guest-in-Residence
- Rania on Not all users ‘like’ the Facebook timeline
- Miguel Arroyo on Not all users ‘like’ the Facebook timeline
- Dawn on Not all users ‘like’ the Facebook timeline





Reader Comments
Flag this comment
Thank you so much for this piece. You need only see the people working in this university's economics department to observe the arrogance that is this "regulatory" idea.
I suspect that it's going to be a long time before arrogant economists get over themselves and concede that letting the referee play in the game is never a good idea.
Flag this comment
I couldn't agree with you more. Your article points out the most important general misunderstandings of the economy today by the general public. Until people realize that "The Government Did It" are the ultimate words of truth on the whole economic situation, there can be no dawning of the brilliance of capitalism in the minds of the public. People will continue blaming "capitalism" for violations of the very basic tenets of capitalism by the government. Thanks for the lone article in support of one of the greatest political systems of our times.
Flag this comment
Thanks for an honest and clearly perceived reading of the situation. It is so rare to find unbiased (in the real sense) commentary that is so simple, innocent and devoid of presumptuousness, superciliousness and ignorance.
I am a big fan, Jordan!!! I always look through the DI to see if there's a piece by you!
Post new comment
You Should Know: The Daily Illini reserves the right to remove any comment deemed racially derogatory, inflammatory, or spammatory. Repeat offenders may have their IP address banned from posting future comments. Please be nice.
Comments will not appear until approved by a site moderator.