2008 Woodie Awards
Illini Media
WPGU
buzz
Illio
TechnographChief affecting academics, report states
By Dan Farnham
Posted: 8/26/04 Section: News
An evaluation team from the Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA) criticized the University Board of Trustees (BOT) for its lack of progress in resolving the Chief Illiniwek controversy in a report released Wednesday.
The NCA did not take any action against the University and said the Chief is not an accreditation issue. However, the report said the Chief controversy hurts the University's academic mission and will continue to do so at an accelerating pace as long as the issue remains undecided.
Although University officials and BOT members do not agree with everything in the report, University spokesman Tom Hardy said the University will take into consideration the report's concern about how the Chief issue affects academics.
"Our effectiveness in educating our students is always a central consideration in all that we do," said Interim Chancellor Richard Herman in a press release. "Because this issue is so important, I believe it is essential that we obtain full and comprehensive information concerning it."
Herman plans on forming a faculty committee of experts to further investigate how the issue actually impacts the University's academic mission.
Hardy said that while the report's concerns were "anecdotal and hypothetical," the faculty committee's findings will be "fact-based."
He said Herman has not yet decided who the committee's members will be and how it will go about its research.
Karen Solomon, assistant director of accreditation services for the NCA, said she was pleased that the University formed a committee that involves the faculty, as the report requested.
The three-person evaluation team created the report based on information collected during an April visit to the University, a follow-up to a 1999 visit. The follow-up visit was meant to look at the BOT's efforts to address the educational and governance issues surrounding the Chief.
The report noted that dialogue on the Chief controversy has increased since the commission's last report, but said that nothing had been done to solve the problem, creating a polarized environment.
The NCA did not take any action against the University and said the Chief is not an accreditation issue. However, the report said the Chief controversy hurts the University's academic mission and will continue to do so at an accelerating pace as long as the issue remains undecided.
Although University officials and BOT members do not agree with everything in the report, University spokesman Tom Hardy said the University will take into consideration the report's concern about how the Chief issue affects academics.
"Our effectiveness in educating our students is always a central consideration in all that we do," said Interim Chancellor Richard Herman in a press release. "Because this issue is so important, I believe it is essential that we obtain full and comprehensive information concerning it."
Herman plans on forming a faculty committee of experts to further investigate how the issue actually impacts the University's academic mission.
Hardy said that while the report's concerns were "anecdotal and hypothetical," the faculty committee's findings will be "fact-based."
He said Herman has not yet decided who the committee's members will be and how it will go about its research.
Karen Solomon, assistant director of accreditation services for the NCA, said she was pleased that the University formed a committee that involves the faculty, as the report requested.
The three-person evaluation team created the report based on information collected during an April visit to the University, a follow-up to a 1999 visit. The follow-up visit was meant to look at the BOT's efforts to address the educational and governance issues surrounding the Chief.
The report noted that dialogue on the Chief controversy has increased since the commission's last report, but said that nothing had been done to solve the problem, creating a polarized environment.
The Daily Illini encourages on-topic discussion through article commenting on its articles and blogs. It is our policy not to delete any comments based upon political or ideological point of view. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, off-topic or use excessive foul language.
The posting of copyrighted material, including any and all content for which you are not the author, is illegal under Federal intellectual property laws. Such activity will not be tolerated. Comments containing copyrighted material will be removed, and continued violation of copyright law is grounds for being banned completely from commenting on DailyIllini.com.
If you feel any post meets these conditions or merits review, please e-mail our editors at meonline@dailyillini.com.