2008 Woodie Awards
Illini Media
WPGU
buzz
Illio
TechnographSupporters continue to see need for at-large seats
By Eric Chima
Posted: 11/9/04 Section: News
Urbana citizens voted overwhelmingly last Tuesday against a referendum that would have added two at-large seats to the city council, but supporters of the bill still believe a change is necessary.
The bill would have made the city council a nine-member body, with seven members elected from wards and two elected citywide.
Tod Satterthwaite, the Urbana mayor and a proponent of the at-large referendum, said he was disappointed that the referendum failed. He said the current ward system gives those voters who live in wards with rapid population growth a smaller voice than those in other wards.
"This isn't something you want to have in a democratic system," Satterthwaite said. "People's voting rights are being compromised."
Alderwoman Esther Patt disagreed, saying Satterthwaite intended to dilute the council with more members.
"They were just making up data to engage people in ignoring the U.S. Constitution," Patt said. "They were attempting to super-size the council to outnumber the liberals."
The city council drew the ward map this spring based on data from the 2000 U.S. Census. Satterthwaite vetoed the map, but was overridden by a 5-2 vote by the council.
Diane Marlin, treasurer of Plus 2 For Urbana, a group that supported the referendum, said the campaign was successful in raising awareness of problems with the ward map.
"By the end, even people who opposed adding seats thought the map was unfair," Marlin said. "People just weren't ready to make that kind of change in the city government."
City council seats will be up for re-election this spring. Marlin said she hopes the new council will address the problem of population differences between wards.
Ben Grosser, chairman of Vote No At-Large, a group that opposed the referendum, said the problem of growing wards was exaggerated.
"I don't agree with the claims," Grosser said. "There is growth all over the city, and (Plus 2 For Urbana's) estimations of the population differences grew weekly."
The bill would have made the city council a nine-member body, with seven members elected from wards and two elected citywide.
Tod Satterthwaite, the Urbana mayor and a proponent of the at-large referendum, said he was disappointed that the referendum failed. He said the current ward system gives those voters who live in wards with rapid population growth a smaller voice than those in other wards.
"This isn't something you want to have in a democratic system," Satterthwaite said. "People's voting rights are being compromised."
Alderwoman Esther Patt disagreed, saying Satterthwaite intended to dilute the council with more members.
"They were just making up data to engage people in ignoring the U.S. Constitution," Patt said. "They were attempting to super-size the council to outnumber the liberals."
The city council drew the ward map this spring based on data from the 2000 U.S. Census. Satterthwaite vetoed the map, but was overridden by a 5-2 vote by the council.
Diane Marlin, treasurer of Plus 2 For Urbana, a group that supported the referendum, said the campaign was successful in raising awareness of problems with the ward map.
"By the end, even people who opposed adding seats thought the map was unfair," Marlin said. "People just weren't ready to make that kind of change in the city government."
City council seats will be up for re-election this spring. Marlin said she hopes the new council will address the problem of population differences between wards.
Ben Grosser, chairman of Vote No At-Large, a group that opposed the referendum, said the problem of growing wards was exaggerated.
"I don't agree with the claims," Grosser said. "There is growth all over the city, and (Plus 2 For Urbana's) estimations of the population differences grew weekly."
The Daily Illini encourages on-topic discussion through article commenting on its articles and blogs. It is our policy not to delete any comments based upon political or ideological point of view. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, off-topic or use excessive foul language.
The posting of copyrighted material, including any and all content for which you are not the author, is illegal under Federal intellectual property laws. Such activity will not be tolerated. Comments containing copyrighted material will be removed, and continued violation of copyright law is grounds for being banned completely from commenting on DailyIllini.com.
If you feel any post meets these conditions or merits review, please e-mail our editors at meonline@dailyillini.com.