Illinois reduces tattoo age
Tattoo parlors welcome younger clients
By Bridget Maiellaro
Posted: 2/27/06 Section: News
- Page 1 of 2 next >
Lawmakers lowered the legal age for tattoos early this year from 21 to 18, even after Gov. Rod Blagojevich's objections in August 2005. After the law took effect on Jan. 1, business at local tattoo parlors substantially increased.
"People have been waiting since the day this law was made for it to be changed," said Stump Cogdill, tattoo artist and owner of Altered Egos, 630 S. Fifth St. "Illinois tattoo artists needed money compared to the other surrounding states."
Altered Egos has had 18-20 year-olds make up 50 percent of their sales since January. Last year, they accounted for zero percent. While some parlors gave tattoos to those under 21 without parental consent before the passing of the law, Altered Egos chose not to.
"We felt that they should have been able to have it anyway," Cogdill said.
Nineteen year-old Kristen Elfstrand, sophomore in LAS, is one of many students who have gotten a tattoo since the law's passing. Elfstrand had her nickname, "Kiki", tattooed in cursive on her upper back, just below her neck earlier this month.
"I was going to wait until I was 21 because I didn't want to go into the parlor with my parents," Elfstrand said. "I wanted it to be something I did on my own, as an adult."
Elfstrand plans on getting at least one more tattoo in the future.
Lindsay Naso, also a 19-year-old sophomore in LAS, was in Altered Egos this past weekend deciding if she truly wanted a tattoo. She spent almost an hour looking at her options.
"I don't want to rush into making a decision," Naso said. "I have to first decide what I want and then if I want that object on me for the rest of my life."
State Rep. Jerry Mitchell (R-90), originally proposed the law in December 2004. Mitchell said that a consistent age limit for both tattooing and body piercing was essential so that shop owners and police could ensure that age restrictions were being enforced. He felt the law would give police more power to go after violators.
"People have been waiting since the day this law was made for it to be changed," said Stump Cogdill, tattoo artist and owner of Altered Egos, 630 S. Fifth St. "Illinois tattoo artists needed money compared to the other surrounding states."
Altered Egos has had 18-20 year-olds make up 50 percent of their sales since January. Last year, they accounted for zero percent. While some parlors gave tattoos to those under 21 without parental consent before the passing of the law, Altered Egos chose not to.
"We felt that they should have been able to have it anyway," Cogdill said.
Nineteen year-old Kristen Elfstrand, sophomore in LAS, is one of many students who have gotten a tattoo since the law's passing. Elfstrand had her nickname, "Kiki", tattooed in cursive on her upper back, just below her neck earlier this month.
"I was going to wait until I was 21 because I didn't want to go into the parlor with my parents," Elfstrand said. "I wanted it to be something I did on my own, as an adult."
Elfstrand plans on getting at least one more tattoo in the future.
Lindsay Naso, also a 19-year-old sophomore in LAS, was in Altered Egos this past weekend deciding if she truly wanted a tattoo. She spent almost an hour looking at her options.
"I don't want to rush into making a decision," Naso said. "I have to first decide what I want and then if I want that object on me for the rest of my life."
State Rep. Jerry Mitchell (R-90), originally proposed the law in December 2004. Mitchell said that a consistent age limit for both tattooing and body piercing was essential so that shop owners and police could ensure that age restrictions were being enforced. He felt the law would give police more power to go after violators.
2008 Woodie Awards
Illini Media
WPGU
buzz
Illio
Technograph
The Daily Illini encourages on-topic discussion through article commenting on its articles and blogs. It is our policy not to delete any comments based upon political or ideological point of view. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, off-topic or use excessive foul language.
The posting of copyrighted material, including any and all content for which you are not the author, is illegal under Federal intellectual property laws. Such activity will not be tolerated. Comments containing copyrighted material will be removed, and continued violation of copyright law is grounds for being banned completely from commenting on DailyIllini.com.
If you feel any post meets these conditions or merits review, please e-mail our editors at meonline@dailyillini.com.