Quantcast The Daily Illini
College Media Network


Column

Immigration policy badly flawed

By Staff Editorial, Tufts University

Posted: 3/14/07 Section: Opinion Columns
  • Print
  • Email
Exactly one week ago, federal authorities raided a leather-goods factory in New Bedford, Mass. and detained 361 workers on suspicion that they were illegal immigrants.

The majority of those detained were mothers who were not given the opportunity to reach relatives to care for their children.

In the wake of this federal action, the Massachusetts Department of Social Services has sent several officials down to the Port Isabel Detention Center near Harlingen, Texas to interview those being held. Governor Deval Patrick has called the situation a humanitarian crisis.

This strong assertion by the governor is right on the money in light of the family ties torn apart over the course of a day and the children abandoned in the wake of this raid. As reported by the Boston Globe, the DSS is now urging the federal government to release the mother of a four-year-old girl who requires a feeding tube and that of a two-year-old boy with a respiratory ailment. One baby whose mother remains in detention has already been hospitalized for dehydration because she was still breast-feeding.

While we recognize that illegal immigration poses a serious problem in this country, we do not think that this predicament justifies government abuse of human rights. Immigration is a complicated issue with far-reaching effects, and immigration law must take this complexity into account. This raid has left social workers in Massachusetts scrambling to ensure that parentless children find some sort of custodial care.

What is particularly disconcerting about this state of affairs is that all the actions taken by the government were legal. Since the passage of a 1996 immigration reform bill, family circumstances can no longer constitute legitimate considerations for an immigration judge reviewing the case of an illegal immigrant.

The implication of this policy is that American citizens under the age of 18 can all of a sudden find themselves alone, without their parents.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

The Daily Illini encourages on-topic discussion through article commenting on its articles and blogs. It is our policy not to delete any comments based upon political or ideological point of view. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, off-topic or use excessive foul language.

The posting of copyrighted material, including any and all content for which you are not the author, is illegal under Federal intellectual property laws. Such activity will not be tolerated. Comments containing copyrighted material will be removed, and continued violation of copyright law is grounds for being banned completely from commenting on DailyIllini.com.

If you feel any post meets these conditions or merits review, please e-mail our editors at meonline@dailyillini.com.

Viewing Comments 1 - 8 of 8

Word from Los Angeles

posted 3/14/07 @ 10:39 AM CST

Other lawbreakers who go to jail for crimes have
children too! Having children should not be a reason
to give lawbreakers a pass!

Old Illini

Old Illini

posted 3/14/07 @ 11:31 AM CST

Simply because the illegal immigrant population has caught on to the tactic of using "anchor babies" to defeat enforcement of our immigration laws is no reason to stop enforcement of those laws. (Continued…)

G

posted 3/14/07 @ 12:24 PM CST

Send them home and tell them to use proper channels to get into our country. Actually, give them a swift kick in the rear for wasting my tax money to send them on a cross country tour. (Continued…)

Ed Weirdness

posted 3/14/07 @ 1:07 PM CST

I am not aware of any impediment that would prevent parents who are deported from taking their children with them. Indeed, from the perspective of parental responsibility this would seem manifest! I would surmise that anchor babies are being used increasingly as a dodge because that's the cry that goes up anytime social policy is questioned "what about the children"?

I would question the motivations and the parental skills of any parent who willfully introduces a child into either an untenable environment where the parents cannot responsibly care for the child, or where the parents introduce the child into their law breaking scheme. (Continued…)

Robby Aultman

posted 3/14/07 @ 2:49 PM CST

Crossing into the U.S. and immediately having children has been a tactic by undocumented aliens in Texas for years. Parkland Hospital in Dallas provides "free" healthcare to illegal aliens having babies. (Continued…)

Wanda

posted 3/14/07 @ 3:05 PM CST

Wer'e told these folks walked across burning sands to trespass into the country. An air-conditioned bus back home can't be all that alarming.

Illegal immigration is not a victimless crime. (Continued…)

Wesley

posted 3/14/07 @ 11:41 PM CST

Suppose a bank robber would automatically be sentenced to a maximum 5 years sentence.
How many bank robbers attempting to obtain say 1-5 million on a heist would we have?
Further Food For Thought "A LINE IN THE SAND"
Senator Mc Caul's Site http://www. (Continued…)

B. Schulz

posted 3/16/07 @ 10:37 AM CST

If a drunk driver were pulled over by police would the police just let him or her go because they have children at home? If police captured a thief burglarizing a home would they let him or her go because they have children at home? There are more unemployed U. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Multimedia Gallery

Advertisement

National College Advertising and Marketing
Privacy Policy     Article Syndication     RSS Terms of Use