Quantcast The Daily Illini
College Media Network


Creator demands Chief logo back from Board of Trustees

Artist wanted use to be 'permanent'

By The Associated Press

Posted: 4/6/07 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
CHAMPAIGN, Ill. - The man who created the circular, orange-and-blue Chief Illiniwek logo for the University of Illinois 27 years ago wants it back.

But the University's board of trustees, which decided in February to retire the long-controversial Chief symbol, said last week that it would retain ownership of the logo, even though it had voted March 13 to stop using the Chief's image, name and regalia.

An attorney for Champaign graphic artist Jack Davis sent a letter to the University on March 14 asking for the return of the logo.

Davis said he sold the logo to the University in 1980 for $210. According to the letter from attorney Robert Auler, Davis "offered" the logo for the University's use "as long as it would be used as a permanent symbol of Illinois athletics."

With the University's decision to stop using the logo, "We have advised him it is his right to resume control of the logo," Auler wrote.

In a written response, the University asked for documents supporting Davis' claim, but added it believes Davis has no right to the logo.

"We do not believe it would behoove Mr. Davis to undertake any licensing efforts or to take any other actions purporting to assume control of the logo," University attorney Mark D. Henss wrote.

Reached at his office Thursday by The Associated Press, Davis declined further comment. Messages left at Auler's office were not returned.

Davis is a 1969 Illinois graduate. His logo depicts the stern-faced Chief in blue and white, surrounded by a blue and orange headdress.

The logo, licensed to makers of T-shirts and other merchandise, generates hundreds of thousands of dollars a year for the University, school officials said. When the University announced last week that it planned to retain rights to the logo, however, it said it planned to phase out Chief-related merchandise by the end of the year.

The University did away with its mascot after two years of NCAA sanctions and two decades of turmoil. Some American Indians and other activists saw Chief Illiniwek as demeaning, while supporters maintained that the chief was an honorable symbol.

The NCAA agreed the Chief was demeaning and banned the University from hosting postseason sporting events; those sanctions ended with the decision to retire the symbol.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

The Daily Illini encourages on-topic discussion through article commenting on its articles and blogs. It is our policy not to delete any comments based upon political or ideological point of view. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, off-topic or use excessive foul language.

The posting of copyrighted material, including any and all content for which you are not the author, is illegal under Federal intellectual property laws. Such activity will not be tolerated. Comments containing copyrighted material will be removed, and continued violation of copyright law is grounds for being banned completely from commenting on DailyIllini.com.

If you feel any post meets these conditions or merits review, please e-mail our editors at meonline@dailyillini.com.

Viewing Comments 1 - 5 of 6

Mark

posted 4/06/07 @ 8:00 AM CST

For having only sold it for $210 dollars, when this symbol undoubtedly has made the University hundreds of thousands of dolalrs over the last 20 or so years, it's hard to believe that they refuse to return the symbol to its creator. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

jkh

posted 4/06/07 @ 8:34 AM CST

I am 110% Pro-Chief. But let's be honest here, this gentleman never had the conversation of the Chief symbol being permanent.

I never thought the Sioux had the right to ask for the regalia back after having sold it, and I don't feel like this gentleman does either (not after 20 years). (Continued…)

BTO

posted 4/06/07 @ 10:44 AM CST

The length of time is irrelevant. The amount he sold it for is irrelevant. All that matters is the content of the contract by which he sold the University the rights. (Continued…)

Betty

posted 4/06/07 @ 11:01 AM CST

I am glad to see that this topic over the chief continue to make headlines. It is more important than other mundane social problems such as healthcare and education. (Continued…)

Billy

posted 4/06/07 @ 2:03 PM CST

I agree with you betty. Thats why the chief should still be here.. There are bigger problems in the world

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Multimedia Gallery

Advertisement

National College Advertising and Marketing
Privacy Policy     Article Syndication     RSS Terms of Use