Champaign repeals smoking ban
By Sky Opila
Posted: 5/14/07 Section: News
Smokers in Champaign will be able to smoke again in bars and restaurants for the next eight months.
The Champaign City Council voted in a 5-4 majority Tuesday night to repeal the Champaign Clean Air Ordinance, which went into effect Jan. 31, 2007. This repeal comes after a bill banning smoking in public places throughout Illinois was passed by the Illinois House of Representatives on May 1, set to go in effect on Jan. 1, 2008.
The repeal of the Champaign bill goes into effect immediately, despite an attempt by some council members to move the date of effectiveness back to Aug. 1. The amendment was identically voted down 5-4.
When the bill was originally passed, Giraldo Rosales was one of the five council members that voted to put the ban in place. However, after the April 17 elections, Karen Foster, who voted in favor of the repeal on Tuesday, was voted to replace Rosales.
Many community members were in attendance to voice their opinions about the smoking ban and its pending repeal.
"I am a small business owner, I don't smoke and I don't allow smoking in my establishment, but I don't want anybody telling me what to do with my business," said Charles Wade, owner of Bait-N-Stuff, 411 Bloomington Road.
Glenn Rasmussen, a Champaign resident and proclaimed smoker, said he has been to downtown Champaign only four times since the ban was originally put in place; however, he said he used to be downtown two to three times a week before that.
"I'm going to continue to smoke cigars and a pipe because that's who I am," Rasmussen said. "And I'm going to continue not going downtown while there's a smoking ban."
Many community members in attendance were wearing T-shirts in support of clean air in Champaign from the Champaign-Urbana Smoke Free Alliance. Daniel Lewart, vice president of the alliance, said repealing the smoking act would be a step backwards for public health.
"It's a tragedy that it took us this long to enact this ordinance and I find it morally repugnant and reprehensible that we're even considering to repeal it," said Ryan Rogers, a community member who was also wearing one of the alliance's shirts.
"To repeal this ban is to be irrational," said Marisa Zapata, University graduate student. "To do this for seven months is completely counter to good governance."
The Champaign City Council voted in a 5-4 majority Tuesday night to repeal the Champaign Clean Air Ordinance, which went into effect Jan. 31, 2007. This repeal comes after a bill banning smoking in public places throughout Illinois was passed by the Illinois House of Representatives on May 1, set to go in effect on Jan. 1, 2008.
The repeal of the Champaign bill goes into effect immediately, despite an attempt by some council members to move the date of effectiveness back to Aug. 1. The amendment was identically voted down 5-4.
When the bill was originally passed, Giraldo Rosales was one of the five council members that voted to put the ban in place. However, after the April 17 elections, Karen Foster, who voted in favor of the repeal on Tuesday, was voted to replace Rosales.
Many community members were in attendance to voice their opinions about the smoking ban and its pending repeal.
"I am a small business owner, I don't smoke and I don't allow smoking in my establishment, but I don't want anybody telling me what to do with my business," said Charles Wade, owner of Bait-N-Stuff, 411 Bloomington Road.
Glenn Rasmussen, a Champaign resident and proclaimed smoker, said he has been to downtown Champaign only four times since the ban was originally put in place; however, he said he used to be downtown two to three times a week before that.
"I'm going to continue to smoke cigars and a pipe because that's who I am," Rasmussen said. "And I'm going to continue not going downtown while there's a smoking ban."
Many community members in attendance were wearing T-shirts in support of clean air in Champaign from the Champaign-Urbana Smoke Free Alliance. Daniel Lewart, vice president of the alliance, said repealing the smoking act would be a step backwards for public health.
"It's a tragedy that it took us this long to enact this ordinance and I find it morally repugnant and reprehensible that we're even considering to repeal it," said Ryan Rogers, a community member who was also wearing one of the alliance's shirts.
"To repeal this ban is to be irrational," said Marisa Zapata, University graduate student. "To do this for seven months is completely counter to good governance."
2008 Woodie Awards
Illini Media
WPGU
buzz
Illio
Technograph
The Daily Illini encourages on-topic discussion through article commenting on its articles and blogs. It is our policy not to delete any comments based upon political or ideological point of view. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, off-topic or use excessive foul language.
The posting of copyrighted material, including any and all content for which you are not the author, is illegal under Federal intellectual property laws. Such activity will not be tolerated. Comments containing copyrighted material will be removed, and continued violation of copyright law is grounds for being banned completely from commenting on DailyIllini.com.
If you feel any post meets these conditions or merits review, please e-mail our editors at meonline@dailyillini.com.
Viewing Comments 1 - 6 of 11
Steve Hartwell
posted 5/15/07 @ 11:41 PM CST
I hope Champaign will permanently repeal the smoking ban.
I am a retired Mechanical Estimator in Toronto, Canada.
Instead of 100 % Smoking Bans and Segregation, I ask Society to consider Reduced Risk
Tobacco Products, which smokers will still enjoy smoking, such as the Canadian
www. (Continued…)
Illinois Graduate
posted 5/16/07 @ 8:59 AM CST
I think we should make smokers pay for our drycleaning services. Raise taxes on all smokers and give the money to non-smokers who have to spend money on washing the smell out of our jackets. (Continued…)
Mattvarbl
posted 5/16/07 @ 12:20 PM CST
"Smokers in Champaign will be able to smoke again in bars and restaurants for the next eight months."
WRONG....The repeal only lifted the smoking ban for Bars (Class A liquor license establishments) which is about 53 locations total. (Continued…)
Lyndsey Williams
posted 5/16/07 @ 9:52 PM CST
Your right it just is bars, maybe the story should be researched CORRECTLY before posting it as a current news story. This repeal is completely ridiculous. (Continued…)
Pauleo
posted 5/17/07 @ 11:49 AM CST
This piece would really benefit from a bit of investigative journalism. All of the interviews were pure speculation. How did the smoking ban affect profits at the bars and tax receipts? What did the bar staff think? How about the business owners?
Drug treatment
posted 10/03/08 @ 8:01 AM CST
Well that's a happy case for smokers, let's hope we won't get a domino effect with this.
Post a Comment