Big Ten Network a letdown
By Kevin Spitz
Posted: 9/12/07 Section: Columns
I recently talked to Marshall Duncan, a sportswriter from the University of Georgia's school newspaper, The Red and Black, and asked if he thought the Big Ten Network helped or hindered the conference. He said: "If they take games that would normally be televised on network TV, then it hurts them because it cuts down on those who will be able to watch. Until the Big Ten Network is nationally offered in a regular package, it seems like they're hurting themselves more than helping."
He's exactly right; without a national audience, the conference's prestige suffers, the teams will be faced with a lower ranking (do you really think a team as bad as Michigan gets a preseason No. 5 ranking without the prestige factor?), and worse than that, recruitment suffers for both students and athletes alike.
Who would a nationally ranked football recruit rather play for? Illinois, on the Big Ten Network, in front of an eight-state audience, or Florida, where every game is on national television?
The idea seems like a quick way to make a couple of dollars for Big Ten sports programs, but in the long run, poor publicity will lead to worse ratings and less money in the Big Ten coffers. Putting Fans First, an organization outraged by the fact that it will have to pay for what was once free, is already turning this into a public relations nightmare. Ten thousand fans have signed up across the nation opposing what they call "The Big Ten Tax."
"I definitely think the Big Ten Network will have a negative impact on the conference, especially when it comes to recruiting and creating new fans," said Ben Falk, spokesperson for the Putting Fans First coalition. "With less access to games, potential recruits may believe that the SEC or Pac-10 are better conferences because they are more visible on national television."
I agree - potential recruits will believe the SEC and Pac-10 conferences are better. That is, until those conferences form their own networks.
Kevin Spitz is a senior in Engineering. He can be reached at sports@dailyillini.com.
He's exactly right; without a national audience, the conference's prestige suffers, the teams will be faced with a lower ranking (do you really think a team as bad as Michigan gets a preseason No. 5 ranking without the prestige factor?), and worse than that, recruitment suffers for both students and athletes alike.
Who would a nationally ranked football recruit rather play for? Illinois, on the Big Ten Network, in front of an eight-state audience, or Florida, where every game is on national television?
The idea seems like a quick way to make a couple of dollars for Big Ten sports programs, but in the long run, poor publicity will lead to worse ratings and less money in the Big Ten coffers. Putting Fans First, an organization outraged by the fact that it will have to pay for what was once free, is already turning this into a public relations nightmare. Ten thousand fans have signed up across the nation opposing what they call "The Big Ten Tax."
"I definitely think the Big Ten Network will have a negative impact on the conference, especially when it comes to recruiting and creating new fans," said Ben Falk, spokesperson for the Putting Fans First coalition. "With less access to games, potential recruits may believe that the SEC or Pac-10 are better conferences because they are more visible on national television."
I agree - potential recruits will believe the SEC and Pac-10 conferences are better. That is, until those conferences form their own networks.
Kevin Spitz is a senior in Engineering. He can be reached at sports@dailyillini.com.
2008 Woodie Awards
Illini Media
WPGU
buzz
Illio
Technograph
The Daily Illini encourages on-topic discussion through article commenting on its articles and blogs. It is our policy not to delete any comments based upon political or ideological point of view. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, off-topic or use excessive foul language.
The posting of copyrighted material, including any and all content for which you are not the author, is illegal under Federal intellectual property laws. Such activity will not be tolerated. Comments containing copyrighted material will be removed, and continued violation of copyright law is grounds for being banned completely from commenting on DailyIllini.com.
If you feel any post meets these conditions or merits review, please e-mail our editors at meonline@dailyillini.com.
Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 23
Paul
posted 9/12/07 @ 7:22 AM CST
I completely agree. I saw the big ten network this weekend, and it looked like a high school A/V project. I'm sick of the athletic department of this school pushing for all of these unnecessary "Improvements". (Continued…)
Jon
posted 9/12/07 @ 8:57 AM CST
I understand your view point. However I don't completely agree with your comments. If you live in a the college town of a Big Ten school. . .or if you live in the state of the Big Ten school that you are a fan of. (Continued…)
Mike
posted 9/12/07 @ 10:13 AM CST
This article not only seems to be missing the point of the Big Ten Network, but also contains factually inaccurate information. For one, Dish Network is not the only way to get the BTN; it's also available on DirecTV. (Continued…)
Ken Plants
posted 9/12/07 @ 11:34 AM CST
I agree with what you wrote. I spent 40 years of my life in Wisconsin and Michigan and have retired to South Carolina. We will never see the BTN without a dish. (Continued…)
Mike2
posted 9/12/07 @ 12:37 PM CST
While I complete agree with the article in regards to the stadium, and am particularly unhappy with the move of the student section, as an alum living hundreds of miles from Champaign, I completely DISAGREE with the comments on the BigTen network. (Continued…)
David '90
posted 9/12/07 @ 2:22 PM CST
The Big Ten Network, so far, has been adequate. It's had some good games, and the announcing crews are very good - since many of them have considerable experience doing Raycom/ESPN+ games in the past, or more. (Continued…)
mark
posted 9/12/07 @ 2:45 PM CST
Wow. You do realize that Puttingfansfirst.com is bought and paid for by Comcast Cable? That's some unbelievably bad research there, dude.
Dan
posted 9/12/07 @ 2:56 PM CST
I found this article very offensive and sincerely wish that you be fired from your position with the Daily Illini you racist bigot.
Brad
posted 9/12/07 @ 3:14 PM CST
This article brings up many valid points. The Big Ten network allows fans of the conference to see more in depth coverage of their teams. However, these fans that really care would look up stats and coaches interviews without the aid of a network's dedication. (Continued…)
Eric '10
posted 9/12/07 @ 3:24 PM CST
I am happy that I have the Big Ten Network at here, but will be very upset if when I return home for Winter Break, where I have Comcast, that I wont have the Big Ten Network. (Continued…)
Post a Comment