Online comment disrespectful
Posted: 5/1/08 Section: Letters
A person calling herself/himself "Martha" posted an online reply to "Remembering Acevedo" (April 28) saying that she/he meant "no offense," but "there's no point in praising somebody paid from ALL STUDENTS' money becoming the 'advocate' of CERTAIN STUDENTS, based on extrinsic, non-academic factors."
Here are my responses.
I wonder why "Martha" limits her/his potential audience to the relatively small number, like me, who read the unpublished, anonymous e-replies to the daily letters.
It's disrespectful, not to say shocking, for somebody to use the occasion of Cathy Acevedo's untimely death to criticize the University for using "ALL STUDENTS' money" to become "the 'advocate' of CERTAIN STUDENTS, based on extrinsic, non-academic factors."
Since when is implementing diversity on campus an "extrinsic, non-academic" factor, and since when is it reprehensible for the University to use the resources of all its students in order to advocate for diversity of every kind for every student on its campus, and which benefits the entire academic community?
I worked with Cathy, I admired Cathy, I respected Cathy, and I liked Cathy. She deserves much better than having her life's work sullied in this callous manner by someone without the courage even to identify herself/himself.
Requiescat in pacem, Dear Cathy.
Chana Bursztyn
University Employee
Here are my responses.
I wonder why "Martha" limits her/his potential audience to the relatively small number, like me, who read the unpublished, anonymous e-replies to the daily letters.
It's disrespectful, not to say shocking, for somebody to use the occasion of Cathy Acevedo's untimely death to criticize the University for using "ALL STUDENTS' money" to become "the 'advocate' of CERTAIN STUDENTS, based on extrinsic, non-academic factors."
Since when is implementing diversity on campus an "extrinsic, non-academic" factor, and since when is it reprehensible for the University to use the resources of all its students in order to advocate for diversity of every kind for every student on its campus, and which benefits the entire academic community?
I worked with Cathy, I admired Cathy, I respected Cathy, and I liked Cathy. She deserves much better than having her life's work sullied in this callous manner by someone without the courage even to identify herself/himself.
Requiescat in pacem, Dear Cathy.
Chana Bursztyn
University Employee
2008 Woodie Awards
Illini Media
WPGU
buzz
Illio
Technograph
The Daily Illini encourages on-topic discussion through article commenting on its articles and blogs. It is our policy not to delete any comments based upon political or ideological point of view. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, off-topic or use excessive foul language.
The posting of copyrighted material, including any and all content for which you are not the author, is illegal under Federal intellectual property laws. Such activity will not be tolerated. Comments containing copyrighted material will be removed, and continued violation of copyright law is grounds for being banned completely from commenting on DailyIllini.com.
If you feel any post meets these conditions or merits review, please e-mail our editors at meonline@dailyillini.com.
Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 1
Eng. Graduate
posted 5/01/08 @ 12:54 PM CST
I have to say I found this letter to the editor rather disturbingly self-absorbed. I understand somebody can admire, like, and respect somebody else. I respect those feelings. (Continued…)
Post a Comment