2008 Woodie Awards
Illini Media
WPGU
buzz
Illio
TechnographUnderstanding two kinds of peace
By Dan Fitzpatrick, The Daily Barometer, Oregon State U. (U-Wire)
Posted: 5/21/08 Section: Opinion Columns
A friend once told me there are two kinds of peace.
The first one is false, when everything is made peaceful not because it is right or just, but because people have artificially forced the peace to happen. He called this "the peace of the grave" because in that kind of peace, something dies in order to bring it about.
The second kind is a true peace, when things are in order and just.
This is the peace that we all really want, but too often we strive for the first one.
In the name of peace and unity, some Americans have tied themselves together and walked out onto freeways, staged sit-ins, stripped off their clothes and draped their naked bodies in treetops, held topless "Breasts not Bombs" rallies and written countless songs of love and togetherness.
None of these help bring about justice or order, which are the only means of securing a real peace.
Justice and order are difficult things to accomplish, however, and so many people simply give up and strive for a counterfeit. This counterfeit is usually called "unity" or "consensus."
When the Hamilton-Baker Iraq Study Group report came out in December 2006, it was lauded as a fantastic solution not on its merits, but because it represented a wonderful consensus opinion of those on the left and right. How wonderful that we can get Democrats and Republicans to agree on something, pundits said.
This must be the answer we've been looking for!
Except that the ISG report was wrong on its prognosis of the war.
The Washington Post declared at the time that the report showed "the war is essentially already lost" - and yet here we are in May 2008 looking back at the great success of the surge and the progress it has fostered in Iraq.
But the condition of Iraq isn't my point. The takeaway from this is that "consensus" opinion doesn't have a thing to do with truth.
No matter how many Sandra Day O'Connors and Vernon Jordans agree on how best to deal with the Iraq war, the fact that they agree on a solution means nothing.
The first one is false, when everything is made peaceful not because it is right or just, but because people have artificially forced the peace to happen. He called this "the peace of the grave" because in that kind of peace, something dies in order to bring it about.
The second kind is a true peace, when things are in order and just.
This is the peace that we all really want, but too often we strive for the first one.
In the name of peace and unity, some Americans have tied themselves together and walked out onto freeways, staged sit-ins, stripped off their clothes and draped their naked bodies in treetops, held topless "Breasts not Bombs" rallies and written countless songs of love and togetherness.
None of these help bring about justice or order, which are the only means of securing a real peace.
Justice and order are difficult things to accomplish, however, and so many people simply give up and strive for a counterfeit. This counterfeit is usually called "unity" or "consensus."
When the Hamilton-Baker Iraq Study Group report came out in December 2006, it was lauded as a fantastic solution not on its merits, but because it represented a wonderful consensus opinion of those on the left and right. How wonderful that we can get Democrats and Republicans to agree on something, pundits said.
This must be the answer we've been looking for!
Except that the ISG report was wrong on its prognosis of the war.
The Washington Post declared at the time that the report showed "the war is essentially already lost" - and yet here we are in May 2008 looking back at the great success of the surge and the progress it has fostered in Iraq.
But the condition of Iraq isn't my point. The takeaway from this is that "consensus" opinion doesn't have a thing to do with truth.
No matter how many Sandra Day O'Connors and Vernon Jordans agree on how best to deal with the Iraq war, the fact that they agree on a solution means nothing.
The Daily Illini encourages on-topic discussion through article commenting on its articles and blogs. It is our policy not to delete any comments based upon political or ideological point of view. However, we reserve the right to remove comments that are abusive, off-topic or use excessive foul language.
The posting of copyrighted material, including any and all content for which you are not the author, is illegal under Federal intellectual property laws. Such activity will not be tolerated. Comments containing copyrighted material will be removed, and continued violation of copyright law is grounds for being banned completely from commenting on DailyIllini.com.
If you feel any post meets these conditions or merits review, please e-mail our editors at meonline@dailyillini.com.
Be the first to comment on this story