Roland Realty has received fewest tenant complaints, CPM has received most

Selma Haveric   Staff Writer  
November 20th, 2009 - 11:18 PM
November 29th, 2009 - 5:25 PM
Campus
Recommend thisPost a commentDecrease Text SizeIncrease Text Size

As winter approaches, students living in campus apartments are becoming more reliant on their housing companies to handle maintenance requests quickly and efficiently.

The Tenant Union provides a list of the number of complaints filed against each housing company in order to keep students informed about their landlords. The complaints that the Tenant Union reports all relate to the landlord’s obligations under the law or according to the terms of the lease. They do not take complaints about roommates, neighborhoods or rent increases.

Some companies have histories of responding to problems in a way that keeps tenants satisfied, while others have several complaints filed against them each year.

Roland Realty has not had a complaint filed against it during the last five years and Bankier Apartments has only had two complaints in five years.

Zach Mueller, a leasing agent at Roland Realty, said that he believes the company has an effective system for addressing tenants’ complaints. Requests are typically handled within two days, he said.

Kirstie Davis, property manager of Bankier Apartments, believes that Bankier also has an efficient system in place. Somebody from the company checks the email every day and fills out maintenance requests, she said. There is also someone on call 24 hours a day, seven days a week to answer emergency requests, she added.

According to the Tenant Union, Campus Property Management, The University Group, Ramshaw Real Estate, C-U Living and Illinois Properties Inc. have had the most complaints filed against them.

At the top of the list is CPM with 66 complaints in the last five years.

Ezim Hamid, junior in actuarial science, said he is not happy with the speed at which CPM responds to requests made by tenants.

“Sometimes it takes them one or two weeks,” he said.

Hamid is also concerned by the fact that the furniture in his apartment is not in great condition.

“The assumption when we first signed the contract was that everything is fine,” he said.

Mohammad Aditi Mat Aris, junior in finance and resident of a CPM building, also said he is not satisfied with how CPM handles maintenance requests. The housing company has been slow to respond ever since the beginning of the semester when he moved in to an unclean apartment, he said.

“I had to call them several times to clean,” he added.

Aditi Mat Aris will be moving out of his building next semester.

Not all CPM residents have complaints, however. Myles Megyesi, junior in computer science, said that his apartment was in decent condition when he moved it, and that the only maintenance request he made all semester was addressed within a few days.

Though CPM has the highest total number of complaints, Michael Jay, director of public relations for the company, said CPM is making changes in order to address complaints more quickly.

This year, the housing company built its own warehouse, meaning that all maintenance supplies can be found in one place. CPM also instituted a hierarchy within their maintenance system in order to increase efficiency- maintenance workers now report to a “team leader” who works beneath the supervisor.

The large number of apartments owned by CPM makes it hard to address all requests immediately, but that the company is working on responding more quickly, Jay said.

“We have, over the last few years, tried to improve,” he said.

Post a commentRecommend this

Reader's Comments

I have lived in both CPM and

I have lived in both CPM and Roland properties. In my opinion CPM is far better. Complaints to Roland management were responded slowly and inexperienced repairmen were sent who poked around and claimed "nothing was wrong." Not very helpful. They also have absolutely no respect for their tenants and only care about the profits. CPM always responded quickly when appliances were broken and often replaced the whole appliance. I would also say the rent prices for CPM are a far better value than anything Roland has to offer. I would choose CPM over Roland every time.

CPM is horrendous

I had an awful year living in a CPM building, but the thing that bothered me the most was that I caught members of their cleaning service hosting a party with at least 20 people in attendance in the unit next to mine just days before the residents moved in. It was in the afternoon on a weekday, during working hours, and these people were drinking alcohol and smoking cigarettes. I called CPM to let them know this was going on and they replied with "Oh, they've got to stop doing that" and that was all.

So, if CPM ever doesn't grant you early move-in, it might be because someone else is having a mid-afternoon bash in your unit (my neighbors requested early move-in but were denied because the unit would not be "cleaned" yet).

here is an idea

for everyone with problems in their apartments that haven't been fixed or have been ignored by management? CALL THE CITY. they will direct you to a website where you can print out a form and write down everything wrong with your apartment/building, send it in, and a building inspector will come to your place. they will walk through (partially with you, partially without), and make notes of all building codes that are in violation. the inspector will then send the landlord or management company a detailed list of things that NEED to be fixed. management has either 2 weeks or 30 days (depending on the severity of the issue) to fix it, or they are fined $5,000 for each infraction. Perhaps if more students/tenants did this, the landlords would quit messing around, since it would start to be extreeeeemely costly.

I did this at my last apartment after being ignored when I complained about electrical problems, and found out that my water heater was outdated/a fire hazard, my windows were against code, my door was not fireproof, the electric in the building was miswired and was potentially dangerous, and a wealth of other problems.

Surprisingly, the realtor was Barr, not CPM. Although, given the chance, I'd go back and call the city on CPM for SURE, because their apartments were horrendous!!

oh god, CPM

okay, so CPM promised to fix the tiles at my old apartment, but that didn't happen so they upgraded me to a new one. nice right? not really. the apartment wasn't cleaned and the furnitures were broken. over 3 months later, 4+ trip to the office to complain, and several phone calls, my apartment still hasn't been cleaned. i talked to the manager and he was very rude and unprofessional and probably don't take us that seriously because we're college students.

Glad to see that CPM is still slimy

I made the common mistake of living in a CPM building many years ago. I called and complained about mold, over and over again. Each time they came over they washed the wall and painted over it. Within 2 weeks mold was back...each time. This lasted about 3 months. Oh and water was leaking through the ceiling onto my bed, they never came out to fix that.

If you want to live in a sh!thole, go with CPM. There is a reason why they have some of the cheapest apartments on campus. I learned my lesson, you get what you pay for, and with CPM it is not very much.

Go and sue me for libel CPM, I documented everything.

Roland

Despite the number of official "complaints", Roland Realty is a terrible company with no respect for its tenants. Last year they promised over and over that 309 would be ready on time, yet I had to live in a motel and sketchy off-campus apartments (where armed robberies occurred) for part of fall semester. Once we moved into 309, they continued to be terrible to us and complaints have been filed; many of them; trust me.

for signing a lease on an

for signing a lease on an apartment that did not yet exist!! FIRST RULE -- only lease a place that's available to live in AT the time of lease-signing. promises are just that -- promises; not results.

You Flunk

The DI fails basic statistics - unless you account for the number of apartments that each company owns, the total number of complaints is a meaningless statistic for comparison. A company might have ten times as many complaints, but own twenty times as many apartments in which case it is better than average. Shame on you for sloppy reporting.

it doesnt matter if you have

it doesnt matter if you have 10 or 100 apartments -- 66 complaints is 66 complaints. the fact of the matter is landlords should be aiming for ZERO complaints, and this just shows that some companies are better at taking care of their employees. i used to live in a cpm apartment several years ago and the laundry room was constantly broken and the maintenance staff's response was continually "what do you want us to do about it? we are busy" -- if they are SO BUSY, maybe they should either hire more maintenance people or sell some of their properties to landlords who actually pay attention to maintenance requests.

er, taking care of their

er, taking care of their tenants, i meant. not employees.

any way you cut it, cpm is a horrible company

first of all, i have a creeping suspicion you might work for cpm. in which case, how do you sleep at night? you're exactly right that the number of units a company owns should be taken into account but we're talking about differences of 2 complaints to 66. not exactly a small margin. i doubt cpm owns 33 times more units than bankier. cpm has that many complaints because their an absurdly poor management company that takes every measure they can to take advantage of college students.

Not neccessarily

http://www.tenantunion.uiuc.edu/frequently_asked_questions.htm:

From the University Tenant Union FAQ site:
"
1. If a landlord has a large number of complaints, is that because it's a big company?

NO. Among the largest companies are landlords who have no complaints. Several of the largest companies have fewer than 5 complaints in five years. Among all landlords, only 10 companies have more than 10 complaints in five years.
"

Based on your logic, you'd have to assume that receiving complaints is a normal occurrence and that it is typical for all landlords to receive them. If that were the case, then, yes larger companies should have more complaints, but landlords, if they are good ones, should have no complaints at all or as few as possible.

While I agree somewhat that a

While I agree somewhat that a counting statistic isn't as relevant for this kind of comparison, zero complaints still equals zero percent which is better than whatever CPM's percent would be. Roland and Bankier are also about as large as CPM, so the comparison is warranted.

Post new comment:
All comments are published at the discretion of The Daily Illini. Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them and do not reflect the views of The Daily Illini, Illini Media or its affiliated and related entities, or its partners, sponsors, advertisers or content providers. Comments are intended to be a means of reaction to a specific article, podcast, or gallery and will be moderated for obscenity and hateful language. Do not submit commercial, off-topic or other copyrighted material.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.