Illinois House votes to ban text messaging while driving
The Illinois House approved the legislation and the Bill now moves on to the state Senate.
The vote passed 89 to 27, as many Illinois lawmakers want to see a decrease in fatal automobile accidents they believe are often caused by cell phone distractions.
Secretary of State Jesse White is especially focused on cutting cell phone usage in both school and construction zones.
“Yes, I text when I drive, said Brittany Harrington, a junior in LAS. The law is for the best overall. It’s much safer to just call someone, but the convenience of texting at a stop light would be missed.”
The law would give police officers the right to pull over any driver in suspicion of text messaging while on the road. After a third offense in a one-year, the prosecuted driver can receive up to 30 days in jail.
“Who can tell who is doing what? Some drivers may simply be eating, assisting a child or grabbing something,” said University Police Lieutenant “Skip” Frost. “Similar to the most recent laws on seatbelts, some officers are more prone than others to regulate.”
According to the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), cell phone distractions were either the primary or secondary cause of 1,001 automobile accidents in Illinois reported in 2008. This was a decrease from the 2007 statistics in which 1,357 accidents were attributed to cell phone usage. IDOT does not specify these statistics strictly on the use of cell phones during the accidents.
“This is an excellent addition to the Illinois law system. Not only could it saves lives and prevent potential harm, it will undoubtedly reduce traffic accidents and congestion on the road,” said Rob Zielinski, a freshman in LAS.
Ten states (Alaska, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Jersey, Utah, Virginia and Washington), as well as the District of Columbia already have bans prohibiting text messaging while driving, according to the Governor’s Highway Safety Association (GHSA).
“I let legislators legislate,” Frost said. “I don’t really have an opinion on the issue. I am paid to enforce the law and will do so. I do understand the idea behind it. It is a bad idea to do anything distracting while driving.”
Angie Rinock, spokeswoman for Statefarm Insurance Agency, said safety is important in her field.
“It’s best to eliminate as many distractions as possible,” Rinock said.
Reader's Comments
Most Popular
Apartment Search
Half off 1st month's rent! Available August 2010! Walk to Campus! Building is only 1 ½ blocks from...
205 East Stoughton , ChampaignJust 4.5 blocks to the main quad and even closer to the Engineering campus. Near parks, shopping,...
1007 S. Locust, ChampaignCastle on Locust Apartments is conveniently located between Chalmers and Armory at Locust and...
1601 E. Florida Ave., UrbanaPremier housing. Spacious 2 bedroom apartments with brand new modern appliances. Private bathrooms...
100 Village Park Way, SavoyExciting New Apartments and Townhouses! Two free Shuttles! Pet friendly 1, 2, 3, & 4 bedrooms with...
Classifieds
- studentpayouts.com Business Opportunities
- WOW Apartments (Furnished)
- 307, 310 E. White, C 307, 309 Clark, C Apartments (Furnished)
- 209/211 E. Clark, C. Apartments (Furnished)
- 3 BEDROOMS Apartments (Furnished)
- Now Leasing Apartments (Furnished)
- 104 N. Lincoln Apartments (Furnished)
- 48 E. John Apartments (Furnished)
- Engineering Campus - Aug. 2010 Apartments (Furnished)
- Starting at 625 Apartments (Furnished)
Restaurants & Bars
Craving Chinese, but can't leave the laptop at home? These places have the best of both worlds.
Calendar
- State of the Art 2010: National Biennial Ceramics Invitational
Parkland Art Gallery - Mar 18, 2010 6:00 pm - UC Books to Prisoners work session
Urbana-Champaign Independent Media Center - Mar 18, 2010 2:00 pm - The White Ribbon
The Art Theater - Mar 18, 2010 7:30 pm - Inner Voices presents two short plays
Armory Free Theatre - Mar 18, 2010 8:00 pm - I Am Asian American Week
Asian American Cultural Center - Mar 18, 2010 6:00 pm








Not enough!
The legislation does not go far enough. A person caught texting while driving should have their motor vehicle confiscated. Period. Driving a motor vehicle is a privilege, not a right. A two ton automobile is also a weapon when improperly used - a dangerous weapon at that. A few examples of such a confiscation and the problem will disappear. If only the same solution could be imposed upon all those guilty of DUI.
why is everyone so up in arms
why is everyone so up in arms about this?
if you dont want to get caught and fined for texting while driving, DONT TEXT AND DRIVE.
really, its not that bad, and frankly, im glad. the world's drivers are bad enough without distractions.
About Time
I'm glad this law is being put into effect sooner than later. In walking from class to class, I've seen one too many close calls where students nearly walk into oncoming traffic while they focus on their cell phones to text people. And these are the pedestrians - imagine drivers distracted enough to not see a car coming or hear a horn honking at them while they blaze a trail, never minding the road, only making sure there's enough signal to send a message.
Personally, I think anyone texting while driving should be ticketed for reckless driving, as it is a major distraction - I don't answer the phone while I'm driving because I know it will cut away from my awareness of the road and endanger those around me. The simple solution is to let a passenger answer it or just let the message wait until your reach your destination - the world doesn't explode just because you made your girlfriend wait a few minutes. If this law helps keep people too stupid to pay attention off the road, then by all means, enact it and enforce it.
You're lucky
This is another way of generating an income, what about putting make-up while driving, going a date and hugging you girlfriend while she's whispering into your ear, reaching to the child in back seat for any reason, eating hamburger and searching for fries, But let me tell you out-there as they claim that "Texting is twice as danger as DUI" YOU ARE VERY LUCKY if you get pulled off and got a citation for $150 (in Illinois) comparing to DUI. Check the list below and be happy by paying $150
If you pulled over for DUI
- You get arrested and taken to jail
- Mug shot taken as if you are a criminal
- Drivers license revoked for a six month unless you install A BAID device ($80 a month)
- No Driving at all for one month
- Kicked out of insurance ( YOU AND YOUR ENTIRE FAMILY)
- DUI Stays in you driving record for the rest of your life
- Must attend a school for some hours, maybe community service and meetings
- lawyer’s cost, court cost …etc by the time your over you pay $5,000 – 7,000.
Now you be the Judge!
Another Reason to Be Pulled?
I'd like to first make perfectly clear that I acknowledge text messaging isn't necessary to be handled while driving. For those that aren't fluent in the operation of their phone, it can cause horrific accidents and loss of life.
For a moment, I'd like to take a step back and look at our police forces and the reasons they are allowed to pull us over. Currently, they are capable of pulling an individual over for suspicion of DUI/DWI, to administer a seat-belt check, or because we actually were caught breaking a law (speeding,reckless driving, etc). If we offer the option to be pulled over due to suspicion of text messaging, the police now have another reason to interfere with a city/suburban dweller's daily life. The officer can also cite "probable cause" to rummage through a motorist's personal property.
Consider this: When a "road block" is in place, the police need to justify its purpose to be a seat-belt check. They may catch several drunk drivers this way, but they're inhibiting the law abiding citizens from commuting from point A to point B as efficiently as possible. Why should everyone be punished for the crimes committed by those that aren't responsible enough to give up their keys? Why aren't the cops capable of keeping watch, as they do on normal nights, to locate the drunks operating vehicles and deal with them accordingly? Doesn't it seem like an efficient way for police to round up the figurative "herd" and catch whomever they see fit, search the remainder of the vehicles on "probable cause", and issue arrests and tickets?
With this new legislation, police have yet another reason to frivolously pull someone over and issue a citation to meet their "unspoken and unlawful" quotas. I've heard many of stories about a cop pulling a motorist over, who hadn't broken any law, informed the individual that they had run a red light, and offered to reduce the penalty to a seat belt violation.
Pushing another point forward, how can they prove it? When I get pulled over, is the cop going to have the capability to check my phone to see when my last text message was sent? Isn't that removing our freedom of communication? If they're pulling us over on suspicion, and removing a device that is bound to us, aren't they violating our freedom of communication? If memory suits, the Columbine crisis was partly blamed on the student's inability to carry their cellular phones. If I'm not in police custody, shouldn't I be able to retain that liberty? Could that also be an easy way for cops to issue revenue-generating citations? Also, with the relatively small size of screens on phone, and the advent of touch-screen dialing, how is a police officer going to be able to effectively suspect "text messaging" when the device is usually located by the steering wheel, below the window level of the vehicle?
What happens if I tap the red button twice or close my phone and the text messaging screen isn't visible on my phone? Am I now tampering with evidence?
Cell phones have become practical PDA's. They are able to play music, manage a person's life, access e-mail, text message, call, and do a variety of other things. Am I going to be pulled over because mine is also a GPS device, and I sometimes drive with it in my right hand when approaching a destination?
I hate to say it, but this seems to have more holes than the Obama-Care health plan. More thought needs to go into laws and law enforcement before the creation of these things. Then again, that's just my $0.02.
Sad
I think it is blatantly obvious that texting while driving leads to more accidents. A study doesn't need to be made to inform us that being distracted while driving will lead to an accident. Drivers should keep distractions to a minimum. Illinois only wants to make this law to reduce accidents and overall harm to our society. It is sad that people are so adamant about texting while driving and refuse to give it up, even if it means someone's life.
Not convicing
I'm not convinced by this study. 23x more likley to be in an accident, or close to an acciden then while not texting. The study was done with truck drivers...truck drivers who have much larger vehicles, sit high off the ground, and have many more blind spots and rely heavily on mirrors who usually travel long distances at a time and are often tired, bored and distracted easily.
How can you possibly compare this to someone texting in a car, truck or suv? Maybe it is only 3x as likley in a car. They should do a study with drive-in food...how many accidents are caused while trying to reach for some more french fries? Are we not alowed to adjust the radio? I have a blue tooth ear piece, but I still have to dial the number--is that texting?
Furthermore, what is this law going to prove? NOt that they do much anway, but are cops going to sit around and be text nazi's and patrol the city streets for criminal texters? And lets say I do get pulled over. "I"m going to give you a ticket for texting." I say "Prove it!"
Another civic champion at work
Sure, I'd like to see you say "prove it" to the cop that pulled you over for texting. He wouldn't have to prove it any more than he has to "prove" you were speeding when your car has stopped. You can take it up with the judge. In the meantime you'll be OFF the streets, which is where you evidently belong, you techno-boob. I had the opportunity to conduct a traffic accident study and you wouldn't believe how many accidents were caused by "unknown" circumstances. The drivers told the cops that "they don't know what happened" and suddenly their car was spinning out of control or rear-ending somebody. For a cop this is code speak for "I was texting" or "I was dialing the phone," but of course they had no proof of it. These cases don't show up in statistics but there are more of them out there than you can count. Don't be a fool. It's a shame that we need a LAW telling us not to text while we drive. Don't people have any common sense?
Another Revenue Generator
This is just another revenue generator and gives the "big brother" cops yet another "right" to pull us over.
What was this based on? I'd like to know, exactly how many accidents were caused by people texting last year? From those accidents, how many were fatalities?
If it really does create a threat, that is if it has been proven to be the DIRECT cause of accidents and fatalities then I will go for it. Otherwise, this is just another revune generator for a state falling apart at the seams by a legislator with an over-inflated ego.
Simply wrong
There was just a major study done at Virginia Tech that found that texting was FAR more dangerous than other forms of distracted driving. Bravo for the Illinois legislature to recognize the danger and act in a timely manner.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/28/technology/28texting.html?scp=1&sq=tex...
I saw plenty of accidents
I saw plenty of accidents happened only because people were text messaging while they were driving. I worked as a driver for Denver remodeling company and that`s where I learned that while driving you must do nothing but drive.
Post new comment:
All comments are published at the discretion of The Daily Illini. Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them and do not reflect the views of The Daily Illini, Illini Media or its affiliated and related entities, or its partners, sponsors, advertisers or content providers. Comments are intended to be a means of reaction to a specific article, podcast, or gallery and will be moderated for obscenity and hateful language. Do not submit commercial, off-topic or other copyrighted material.