GEO trying to protect what we already have
The GEO’s proposal to protect tuition waivers in our contract seems to be particularly galling to the uninformed. Tuition waivers are a standard feature of graduate education throughout this University and around the country. All but the choosiest graduate departments offer their students tuition waivers—essentially full scholarships. Very few graduate students anywhere (with the exception of business and medical students) pay tuition.
Graduate students on fellowship receive tuition waivers. Research assistants either receive tuition waivers from their departments or their grants pay their tuition (plus 58% overhead—money that the students never see that goes straight to the university on top of their tuition). Teaching and graduate assistants’ tuition waivers are typically tied to working a certain number of hours per week that varies according to their department.
We are not asking for a new kind of compensation; we are trying to protect what we already have. In the University of Illinois system, the Board of Trustees’ General Rules waive in-state tuition for “graduate assistants.” The rules were written before the GEO was formed, so we are negotiating over what “graduate assistants” means, because the University divided GAs and TAs from RAs when the GEO formed. This spring the administration proposed canceling tuition waivers for appointments less than 50% (20 hours per week). Hundreds of graduate students (TAs, GAs, RAs) in programs such as the fine arts or dual-degree track (MD/PhD) rely on 25% and 33% appointments and the concomitant tuition waiver, because we cannot work more than 10 or 13 hours per week and still make progress toward our degrees. Moreover, sometimes we have to cobble together appointments to reach 50%, so students who are working half-time on multiple appointments might potentially have lost their waivers, despite having come here with the expectation of that financial support.
Kristen Ehrenberger,
graduate student
Reader's Comments
Most Popular
Apartment Search
Convenient location. Near Engineering Quad and County Market. Central Heating and Air Conditioning....
1007 S. Locust, ChampaignCastle on Locust Apartments is conveniently located between Chalmers and Armory at Locust and...
205 East Stoughton , ChampaignJust 4.5 blocks to the main quad and even closer to the Engineering campus. Near parks, shopping,...
503 East Clark Street, ChampaignAvailable August 2010. Offers furnished efficiency apartments. Units include a large living/bedroom...
56/58 E. Healey, ChampaignLocated at the west edge of campus, these 1 bedroom apartments are perfect for a student who wants...
Classifieds
- Pfeffer Properties Houses for Rent
- PARKING NOW Parking/Storage
- BEST OFFER CAMPUS Apartments (Furnished/Unfurnished)
- 203 S. Wright Apartments (Furnished/Unfurnished)
- 203 Healey, C. Apartments (Furnished)
- 507 S. Fourth Apartments (Furnished)
- Castle on Locust Apartments (Furnished)
- Deluxe Townhouses Apartments (Furnished)
- 402 N. Gregory Apartments (Furnished)
- See What's Inside Apartments (Furnished)
Restaurants & Bars
Hungry for Asian cuisine?
Calendar
- Bunny Basket Patrol
Savoy Recreational Center - Mar 20, 2010 3:00 pm - Keith Harden
Huber's West End Store - Mar 20, 2010 8:00 pm - Virginia Theatre
Virginia Theatre - Mar 19, 2010 11:00 pm - Live Jazz
Jim Gould Restaurant - Mar 20, 2010 7:00 pm - Baby Expressions
Savoy Recreational Center - Mar 20, 2010 2:00 pm









Graduate student funding differs from undergraduate funding
Dear BRealistic,
You write, "So why exactly is it that you EXPECT a tuition waiver for merely working 10-13 hours per week? It's not the university's problem that you are an MD/PhD student and cannot work any more than that."
Funding is different for graduate and undergraduate students, and yes, it is the University's "problem" that I cannot work more hours. As I explained in my letter, I expect a tuition waiver because I was accepted at this University as a graduate and medical student with impeccable qualifications and the understanding of financial support (as long as I remain in good standing), meaning a tuition waiver connected either to a fellowship or to the number of hours of work dictated by my progress in the program. These are the terms of my acceptance a program that the University has constructed in just this way. Because I am a full-time student in good standing working towards my degree(s), and because I am already working the maximum number of hours my program will allow, I do expect to be payed enough to live on. All workers deserve a living wage, and the University is out of line to make these programs untenable by removing tuition waivers (as they threatened last semester), or to fail to provide students with their basic needs while here (for the living-wage numbers, check out: The University’s estimated cost of living for a graduate student for AY2009/10 is $16,086 (http://registrar.illinois.edu/financial/grad_expenses.html ).
Congratulations on succeeding at balancing such a difficult schedule, but please understand that we are in different positions in our respective educations.
Clarification
In rereading my comment I see that I may have conflated two issues. Students working 50% (as I did while I was in the history department), deserve a living wage. While working 25% (as I do in the medical school), I do not expect a living wage; I do expect a tuition waiver, however, as was promised to me when I began graduate school. The quarter-time tuition waiver is what makes my program work.
That having been said, during bargaining on Saturday the GEO agreed to drop its request for a living wage in exchange for the University dropping its request to be able to furlough graduate employees. The sole issue over which the strike was called is **tuition waivers**, which as I explain are a standard feature of graduate education. A tuition waiver costs the University nothing. No money changes hands unless the student in question is being funded from an outside grant, in which case the grant pays the student's tuition. (This is common in the sciences.) By refusing to protect tuition waivers--a zero-cost proposal--the University is implicitly indicating its intention of revoking them, probably by requiring out-of-state students to pay the difference between in-state and out-of-state tuition (about $13K/year). That is patently unacceptable and will adversely affect the quality of graduate student attracted to the University of Illinois.
Clarification
In rereading my comment I see that I may have conflated two issues. Students working 50% (as I did while I was in the history department), deserve a living wage. While working 25% (as I do in the medical school), I do not expect a living wage; I do expect a tuition waiver, however, as was promised to me when I began graduate school. The quarter-time tuition waiver is what makes my program work.
That having been said, during bargaining on Saturday the GEO agreed to drop its request for a living wage in exchange for the University dropping its request to be able to furlough graduate employees. The sole issue over which the strike was called is **tuition waivers**, which as I explain are a standard feature of graduate education. A tuition waiver costs the University nothing. No money changes hands unless the student in question is being funded from an outside grant, in which case the grant pays the student's tuition. (This is common in the sciences.) By refusing to protect tuition waivers--a zero-cost proposal--the University is implicitly indicating its intention of revoking them, probably by requiring out-of-state students to pay the difference between in-state and out-of-state tuition (about $13K/year). That is patently unacceptable and will adversely affect the quality of graduate student attracted to the University of Illinois.
So why exactly is it that you
So why exactly is it that you EXPECT a tuition waiver for merely working 10-13 hours per week? It's not the university's problem that you are an MD/PhD student and cannot work any more than that. Graduate students are EXACTLY THAT, students. I personally am a full-time undergraduate student, work as a TA for a class which requires approximately 16-18 hours per week of my time, and work in the Meat Sciences Lab 15-20 hours per week, often helping students in Animal Sciences classes. What do I receive for this?... 3 credit hours (for being a TA) for the semester and $7.75/hour for working at the MSL. Despite the fact that both of my jobs are for the university I do not expect $10,000+ per year in tuition plus a salary and health benefits. Why, you ask? Because I am a STUDENT, I made the choice to be a STUDENT, and could have made the choice to be a student at a different university where the benefits are better.
The reality is, we are in tough economic times and everyone has to make cut-backs, even our beloved TA's. If so many other universities have better graduate employment opportunities, go somewhere else. The reality is, you chose to come here in the first place because you are receiving an extremely valuable benefit, which cannot be taken from you in your bargaining agreements, a graduate degree from the University of Illinois.
All of us were
All of us were undergraduates, and all of us had to pay tuition (or earn scholarships) too. Even though college is expensive, the difference in salaries between high school and college graduates is great enough to make the temporary debt worthwhile for most people. With the exception of professional programs like MBA's, medical school, or law school, graduate school is very different. To become a moderately salaried academic professor is not even close to worth 11 years of massive debt. This is why tuition wavers are *the standard* for just about every respectable graduate program.
I have encountered graduate programs in my field without tuition wavers...usually just for MA's or first year grad students. The best students don't go to these programs because they can get better offers elsewhere. Among the other accepted applicants, only the super young and wealthy, whose parents don't mind subsidizing them for 7 years, end up going. If you want to turn this school into a degree factory that caters to the wealthiest rather than the brightest students, keep arguing for the university's right to get rid of our tuition wavers.
Post new comment:
All comments are published at the discretion of The Daily Illini. Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them and do not reflect the views of The Daily Illini, Illini Media or its affiliated and related entities, or its partners, sponsors, advertisers or content providers. Comments are intended to be a means of reaction to a specific article, podcast, or gallery and will be moderated for obscenity and hateful language. Do not submit commercial, off-topic or other copyrighted material.